E continua ... ora, isto devia ser óbvio, mas é precisamente por isto que "eles" criaram, de fio a pavio, a idéia da ciência do aquecimento global ser controvertida (como antes o conseguiram com a ciência dos efeitos do tabaco; com a ciência dos efeitos do chumbo - ah!, então, não sabiam o que custou para termos a gasolina sem chumbo?). Vejam por favor a nota abaixo de 21.12.09

Warming or not, we must end global oil economy: "As the world's leaders begin a second round of climate talks, it would behoove those who question the science behind global warming to understand that the world's current energy policy is unsustainable. This means that the proposed carbon reduction goals will help drive the world towards new sources of energy -- a good thing for all. The assembled international presidents and prime ministers must attempt to set realistic goals that address the issues that can be tackled, and new sources of energy should be at the top of the to-do list."