E continua .... a revisão da previsão sobre os glaciares nos Himalaias, e outras sobre a "incerteza" quanto aos resultados da ciência

• Chinese cities are greener than American cities | The Economist

• UN climate scientists review Himalayan glaciers claim | Environment | guardian.co.uk

• Memo to IPCC: Please reanalyze ALL of your conclusions about melting ice and sea level rise « Climate Progress

• Why hasn't Earth warmed as much as expected? New report on climate change explores the reasons | Climate Ark

• Australian Scientists: Contrary to media reports (and tweets), “our paper does not discount climate change as playing a role in this most recent drought, the ‘Big Dry’. In fact, there are indications that climate change has worsened this recent drought.” « Climate Progress

•  Climate Feedback: AMS2010: Data gaps and errors may have masked warming

• RealClimate: The IPCC is not infallible (shock!)

• The real Himalayan scandal | Isabel Hilton | Comment is free | The Guardian  

_________

PS: Mais este: The IPCC's 2035 prediction about Himalayan glaciers: "The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report contains a mistake. This is not the first inaccuracy to be found in the AR4 - there have been several papers demonstrating where IPCC predictions have underestimated the climate response to CO2 emissions. However, this time the climate response has been overestimated. Specifically, the IPCC AR4 predicted the Himalayan glaciers would disappear by 2035 which is decidedly not the case. What's the significance of this error? To determine this, let's look at how it happened and the broader context."